Those who experience a tragedy and discuss it in the newspaper, on television, or on blogs — these people are also a reality, a reality that can move something. It was three years ago. My passport had been stolen and I went to the police to write a statement about its loss or theft. My precinct officer was not there, and so someone else, a young guy, received me. When he learned from the questionnaire where I work, he asked me a question. He asked it so earnestly, and with such surprise, honesty, and he looked into my eyes with such purity and said: «Why did you at 'Novaya Gazeta' raise such a fuss about the death of Anna Politkovskaya?» At that moment I thought that I had lost my mind. The blood rushed to my head, and immediately I wanted to really do something to this policeman, to physically destroy him somehow. But, instead, I talked with him very quietly, very slowly, and very clearly. This is totally atypical for me. In such cases my origin from a southern city starts to show, and I yell, I roar and insult… But here I was, sitting there, I am outwardly calm, and I tried to cram something into this officer’s head. For a long time I told him about Anna Politkovskaya, about how she saved people, about how many Russian military officers and police officers approached her for assistance when they had absolutely no one else to turn to. She helped more than anyone, and they were officers or the most ordinary of patrolmen, who had used and tossed aside, given up, betrayed, and sold out, guts and all, by their immediate superiors. It had been only eight months since Anya died, and the pain was so strong, even though today it is no easier, it is absolute twaddle that time heals all wounds… But, back to the policeman: At first I did not understand what happened to him, but at some point in the conversation he suddenly looked anxious and guilty, and kept repeating the same words whenever I took a break: «Excuse me, excuse me…» I was not going to write this story, it is so atypical, and somewhat, possibly, very personal. To some it might even seem like one of those sentimental Indian films. But I think about it whenever in the newspapers, or on television, or the Internet, they discuss what had happened to Oleg Kashin, and how journalists in Russia are beaten and killed by the dozen every month. And in the debate I heard again a familiar theme: «Why do you lift yourselves up so high? Are you journalists better than anyone else?» Not by any means, and certainly not in this case, but someone has touched the very heart of the discussion. Conversation is just a bunch of words and they may lead to nothing, and accomplish nothing. But why is that? Even if people (not necessarily journalists) talk about what happened to Oleg Kashin, or Mikhail Beketov, if they talk about their feelings, about their emotions, about how these feelings and emotions are sensed and felt, and if these people think of some way to help Oleg, or Mikhail, or someone else, then what is so bad about it? A man once said: «Can we not experience that, which we are experiencing, or experience that, which we are not experiencing?» Do not get introspective and try to answer these questions. You cannot answer many questions, so do not go off on your own. We may find within our self that, which is the exact opposite of our self. Sometimes it does not hurt, not just for others, but also for our self, to «go in through the back door». You can talk with yourself without sincerity, just as if you were talking with a stranger. And just maybe you might encounter a strange sincerity, not just strange, but alien, a terrifying you (see my meeting with the precinct officer), and try, despite that very anxious point of the conversation, to explain, to explain and to correct something very important. In the end we are all connected with one another, and we all live inside one another. To the visible world is added to a world of desires, which is visible only to the spirit. Much depends now on the doctors who are treating Oleg Kashin, on the police who are looking for the protestors picketing Petrovka who attacked Oleg. But those who are very keen for Oleg to recover, who pray for him, these people are also a reality, a reality that can move something, and change things for the better. Just like those people who talk about it in the newspaper, on TV, or in blogs. I believe in the redemptive power of words. You should not neglect the word as something quite insignificant. And conversation as such need not be neglected. Journalism is not a bunch of petty tricks of the trade; it is not a question of technique and some basic skills and dexterity. It is a question «of an idea, a strong idea, and a conscience.» Yes, ideas can be «hollow», and pictures (or talk) can be empty and useless duplication of effort. But nothing prevents us from starting over, or continuing to invest our efforts in the job, and then looking for something that is not there. We, of course, do not read text, we read with text. But in a good text each word has a specific definition, and each of us attaches their thought or their image to it, which is often counter the intent. But in good text all the errors of thought that we make are good. In conversation or text (and text is conversation) there is sense. The main thing is not to substitute imitation for reality. And to Oleg Kashin, I wish you a speedy recovery. By Zoë YEROSHOK Observer for 'Novaya Gazeta' 15.11.2010 Views: 3240 | E-mail
|
- Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
- Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
- Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
- Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
- Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
|
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6 AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze — www.mamboportal.com All right reserved |