home arrow 2002 arrow A.Soldatov: “Intelligence reported about a terrorist attack”

home | домой

RussianEnglish

similar

Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina
Уже 22 года...
24/10/24 13:38 more...
author Аноним

Kurbatova, Christina
Детки
Милые, хорошие наши детки!!! Так просто не должно быть, это больно, это нечестно, это ужасно.
30/06/24 01:30 more...
author Ольга

Grishin, Alexey
Памяти Алексея Дмитриевича Гришина
Светлая память прекрасному человеку! Мы работали в ГМПС, тогда он был молодым начальником отдела металлов, подающим боль...
14/11/23 18:27 more...
author Бондарева Юлия

Panteleev, Denis
Вот уже и 21 год , а будто как вчера !!!!
26/10/23 12:11 more...
author Ирина

Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina
Помним.
24/10/23 17:44 more...
author Аноним

A. Soldatov: “Intelligence reported about a terrorist attack”
Written by Михаил Фальков   
Вторник, 05 Ноябрь 2002

захват людей в центре столицы уже сам по себе является одним из крупнейших провалов в истории российской разведкиInterview with an expert


Since the release of hostages from the bearing plant’s theatrical center, there have been different assessments of the actions of the security services, both in Russia and abroad. Moreover, it is believed that capture of civilians in the capital is by itself one of the biggest failures in the history of Russian intelligence.

To find out if such a view corresponds to reality, ‘Russian Journal’ asked one of the leading specialists on the security services. Andrei Soldatov for more than two years has been the coordinator of Russia’s largest network resource on the subject, and works with many media outlets in the CIS, the West, and the Middle East. He has sources in the security agencies, so his comments on the latest events in Moscow found their way into several European publications.


From October 23rd through the 26th, Soldatov was at the scene, and that, together with his special knowledge, allowed him to analyze the current situation within his area of expertise.


Russian Journal: Do you think that this hostage taking in the capital was one of the largest failures of Russian intelligence in the North Caucasus and the near and far abroad?


Andrei Soldatov: Yes, it was a failure, but not from an intelligence standpoint, but from the standpoint of counterintelligence and the Interior Ministry. According to my data, already by October 10th the intelligence agencies had sent the ministry information about a planned terrorist attack. The data, however, was very vague: “several women are traveling from Chechnya to the capital for a terrorist attack.” I think that this was because of mistrust between the intelligence agencies and the Interior Ministry, and the reason for this was the more than strange behavior on the part of the police force about a year ago. Back then the Interior Ministry sent its units, including departments in Moscow, photographs of two women who were wanted as terrorists, and who had come to Moscow to carry out a bombing. According to my data, photographs were transmitted to the Interior Ministry with instructions not to be posted at precincts, because security service agents took the photos, and publishing these pictures would automatically blow their cover. The photos were secret, and so they were supposed be used to make verbal descriptions of the wanted women. The police force distributed them anyway, and so the agents got burned. This led to a sharp decline in specific data, since the agencies simply stopped trusting each other.


Russian Journal: The former commander of ‘Alfa’, Viktor Karpukhin, noted that the foreign intelligence agencies provided the Russians with special assistance. According to him, “for the first time the Americans and British openly and honestly gave us all the information. They have a lot of high-paid agents among the terrorists in Chechnya, Georgia, and the Middle East.” Do the FSB, SVR (Russian foreign intelligence service), and GRU (Russian military intelligence) have any such agents in these regions?


Andrei Soldatov: Of course there are, but the problem is not lack of intelligence information, but its use.


Russian Journal: In your opinion, how will recent events affect the tasks and practical work of the Russian secret services abroad?


Andrei Soldatov: There is discussion now about increasing the funding of the intelligence agencies. Intelligence for a long time has moaned about the lack of resources, because of which it had to cease work in many world regions. Regardless of the recent events, I think there will be increased funding for intelligence activities on the African continent. The fact is, every month Russian firms in this region increase their activity, and there has been a lot of discussion about intelligence support for our business interests down there. But it is hard to draw any conclusions about current events, since the response of our colleagues in the West is still very ambiguous.


Russian Journal: Could the intelligence agencies of some Middle Eastern countries have been involved in the terrorist attack in Moscow, given that in recent years they have been supporting Wahhabis in the Caucasus?


Andrei Soldatov: In principle they could have been involved, but a theory that is more popular among members of our intelligence services is that there was CIA involvement in the events. Before the assault, it was claimed that the Americans would find us a way out of the situation in exchange for support against Iraq. After the assault, this theory, of course, ceased to exist, but the mistrust remains.


Russian Journal: What do you know about the Arab participants in the hostage taking?


Andrei Soldatov: They have stated the citizenship of several of the hostages (sic), but I personally have not seen their papers. Although there have been documents removed from their corpses, I am afraid to trust the official sources here.


Russian Journal: How do you explain the terrorists’ strange behavior? They clearly had an unattainable goal for committing the terrorist attack, and they did not fulfill their promise to blow up a building, even though they had enough time, and so on.


Andrei Soldatov: What makes you think that they did not achieve their goal? In any case, they did better than, for example, Palestinian suicide bombers. They managed to get two demonstrations going in Moscow, one even on Red Square, and their position was aired on all the television channels. The public was reminded that there is a war going on in Chechnya, while the media in the West called for a “peaceful solution” to the issue. And in the end, fifty martyrs cost more than one hundred fifty, at a minimum, civilian lives. Really, was this not a lot?


Russian Journal: If the terrorists were already under the influence of the gas, why did they not arrest them so that they could testify?


Andrei Soldatov: It is being claimed that the commandos were seized by emotion and shot all the terrorists. I do not quite believe this. As I see it, the authorities now are carrying out a propaganda campaign about the successful end of the special op. Living terrorists, from whom we should have been able to get testimony, might have hindered the campaign. The fact is, the operational-investigation group is composed of representatives from various departments that are in competition with each other. In addition, everyone is well aware that sooner or later the question will arise: who is to blame for letting a terrorist group get to Moscow? Then information will begin to leak out of the investigation, as has happened more than once.


Russian Journal: Deputy Interior Vasiliev called the hostage rescue operation “brilliant”, while Kadyrov, the interim head of Chechen administration, added that it “can safely be included in textbooks at security service institutes.” Do you agree with this assessment, and why?


Andrei Soldatov: I do not have access to the plans of this operation, so I cannot judge how they were implemented, that is, what percentage of the hostages did the operational headquarters originally write off? How long its was supposed to last? And so forth. Judging from the casualties among the commandos, the operation went very really professionally.


Interview by Mikhail Falkov


Arbeit macht frei
P. S. On November 1st the offices of ‘Versiya’ were searched. Eight FSB officers came and seized the newspaper’s server, as well as the computer of national security editor Andrei Soldatov. He suggested that the visit by the FSB was connected with an upcoming edition of the paper, which would have 4 columns dedicated to details of the ‘Nord-Ost’ hostage rescue operation, and it was feared that the edition would never make it to print. On November 4th, however, the newspaper came out. That same day, an FSB investigator conducted his first interrogation of Andrei Soldatov, which lasted about two hours. According to the journalist, he was not asked any questions about his materials. The investigator’s questions were on general aspects of the paper, and touched on the May edition of the newspaper, which on October 18th led to criminal charges against the paper. According to Andrei Soldatov, he was not asked to sign his testimony, nor was he given an appointment for another interrogation.


Views: 6262 | E-mail

  Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze — www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

 
< Prev   Next >