today
| ïîñëåäíèå íîâîñòè |
| 2023 |
| 2022 |
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2003 |
| 2002 |
similar
- Interview with the gunmen in the ‘Nord-Ost’ auditorium
- The Genealogy of Chechen terrorism
- Telephone interview with Abu-Sayeed, assistant of Chechen suicide group leader Movsar Barayev
- Strasbourg court accepts complaint from victims of the terror act at Dubrovka
- The Russian government must answer questions about the ‘Nord-Ost’ case at the European Court
- Hostages of a principle
- Law will require Russian citizens “not to tell tales out of school”
- You just cannot lie like this
- Çàêîí î ñîöèàëüíîé çàùèòå ãðàæäàí, ïîñòðàäàâøèõ îò òåððîðèñòè÷åñêèõ àêòîâ. (Ïðîåêò)
- The Edge of Time
- The terrorist attack in Beslan:
- ‘NORD-OST’ IN STRASBOURG: THE OUTCOME
- Suicide bomber with a master’s degree
- Media learns of negotiations with terrorists following '72
- Russian girls in Wahhabi plans
- Ðîññèè íóæåí çàêîí î ñòàòóñå æåðòâ òåðàêòîâ
| Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina |
| Óæå 22 ãîäà... |
| 24/10/24 13:38 more... |
| author Àíîíèì |
| Kurbatova, Christina |
|
Äåòêè Ìèëûå, õîðîøèå íàøè äåòêè!!! Òàê ïðîñòî íå äîëæíî áûòü, ýòî áîëüíî, ýòî íå÷åñòíî, ýòî óæàñíî. |
| 30/06/24 01:30 more... |
| author Îëüãà |
| Grishin, Alexey |
|
Ïàìÿòè Àëåêñåÿ Äìèòðèåâè÷à Ãðèøèíà Ñâåòëàÿ ïàìÿòü ïðåêðàñíîìó ÷åëîâåêó! Ìû ðàáîòàëè â ÃÌÏÑ, òîãäà îí áûë ìîëîäûì íà÷àëüíèêîì îòäåëà ìåòàëëîâ, ïîäàþùèì áîëü... |
| 14/11/23 18:27 more... |
| author Áîíäàðåâà Þëèÿ |
| Panteleev, Denis |
| Âîò óæå è 21 ãîä , à áóäòî êàê â÷åðà !!!! |
| 26/10/23 12:11 more... |
| author Èðèíà |
| Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina |
| Ïîìíèì. |
| 24/10/23 17:44 more... |
| author Àíîíèì |
| In the name of the Constitution |
| Written by ÃÅÍÍÀÄÈÉ ÑÀÂ×ÅÍÊÎ | ||||||||
| ×åòâåðã, 15 Ìàðò 2007 | ||||||||
|
By GENNADY SAVCHENKO  Russia awaits Prosecutor General of Kabardino-Balkaria, Yuri Ketov, announced yesterday that criminal cases regarding the militant attacks on Nalchik in October of 2005 will be transferred to one of the national courts as early as this May. The trial this year will not be the only one associated with those memorable events. An investigation into the circumstances of the attack that occurred two years ago will take place in the Constitutional Court of Russia, as well as at the European Court of Human Rights. According to Ketov, to date the criminal case contains over 700 volumes, to which will be added many indictments. In this manner the trial will last longer than a year. The total number to be prosecuted is 59. These people, according to investigators, were either directly involved in the attack on Nalchik, or were accomplices of the militants — mainly members of the Wahhabi Jamaat. The attack’s leader and organizer, Anzor Astemirov, is now a fugitive. ‘Emir Sayfullah’ (as Astemirov calls himself) recently showed up, posting on the There could have been more defendants: 12 others, who were arrested in a case not directly linked to the preparation and conduct of the terrorist attack, were granted amnesty. A large number of defendants in such a large terrorist attack is truly unique, but the attack itself, an attack on law enforcement buildings in the capital of a federation subject republic, is also unique. According to official figures, during the battle on October 13th, 2005, 35 law enforcement officers, 14 civilians, and 92 militants were killed. Europe wants an explanation The trail in Nalchik practically coincides with the entry of a complaint before the European Court of Human Rights in its active phase. It is the case of ‘Halimat Sabancheeva and others v. Russia’, which was filed in the fall 2005. Its authors are 50 relatives of militants (or those whom the police believe to be militants). The militants were killed during the attack on Nalchik. That same year, they had unsuccessfully sought the bodies of their relatives, which are still being held, according to some sources, in one of the morgues in Back in December, the European Court of Human Rights sent to the Russian authorities a ‘communication’ (a document drawn up by the court on the basis of a complaint), asking them to clarify whether the position of the Russian authorities corresponds with the Convention on Human Rights. If Russia gives an affirmative response, than it must defend its position in court. The response (to the A time of courts On March 1st, in a closed plenary session of the Constitutional Court, a claim was heard on the 2002 amendments to the Basic Law (ed: the Russian constitutional ‘bill of rights’). The initiators of the claim were the relatives of the slain militants. During the past year, the relatives had twice before unsuccessfully attempted to bring suit. “Freedom of conscience is guaranteed by the Constitution. It is a punishment for a practicing Muslim to not bury a dead body within a certain period of time, but the guilt of these dead was never proven in court, so how can they be punished? In addition, the punishment was extended to their relatives, and they were not allowed to perform necessary rituals,” said Yevgeny Ikhlov, head of the information and analytical service movement ‘For Human Rights’, who helped prepare the lawsuit. “We do not believe that the slain were terrorists,” echoed lawyer for the plaintiffs Larisa Dorogova, whose nephew Martin died during the battles on October 13th. “If they were participants in the events, however, then their actions should be categorized differently.” Note that she and her companions in misfortune formally expressed their position on the issue on November 7th, 2005, in a letter addressed to then-Prosecutor General Vladimir Ustinov, to the president and prosecutor general of Kabardino-Balkaria, Arsen Kanokov and Yuri Ketov, and the head of the investigative group for the Southern Federal District, Alexander Sovrunin. The position of the letter was that all responsibility for the incident rests with the local Ministry of Internal Affairs. More precisely, with Hakeem Shogenov, at the time Interior Minister of Kabardino-Balkaria, Anatoly Kyarov, chief of the organized crime department, and Beslan Mukozhev, head of the religious extremism department. These people, according to the letter, unleashed “massive repression of Muslims” that provoked to armed intervention “the pure souls” of young people who “many times had attempted to protect their rights legally and peacefully.” According Dorogova, she could defend such a position at the trail of the remaining participants in the Nalchik attack. Relatives of the slain militants, however, have not been subpoenaed, thereby depriving them of being able to defend their relatives’ good names in court. “The verdicts of the Constitutional and Nalchik courts are, in general, easy to predict, but what decision will be made in Strasbourg, this is the big question. If the decision is not in Russia’s favor, we risk yet another cause for confrontation with the West. Our government will, of course, not implement the decision — hardly anyone in the Kremlin wants to create a place of worship for some future Shamil Basayev,” said the deputy director of the Center for Political Technologies, Alexei Makarkin. Terrorists in unmarked graves Salman Raduyev was a In March 2003, the bodies of 41 terrorists (22 men and 19 women) were secretly buried in one of the (Moscow) metropolitan cemeteries. They had been killed on October 26th, 2002, during the storming of the Chechen field commander Ruslan Gelayev was buried in an unmarked grave after he was shot to death on February 28th, 2004, on the 32 militants, who were killed on September 3rd, 2004, in Beslan elementary school No. 1, (which they had seized three days previously), were buried in an unknown cemetery without notification of their relatives. The then deputy prosecutor general of Russia, Nikolai Shepel, announced this on February 4th, 2005. Beforehand, the bodies of the terrorists were subject to lengthy forensic investigations. ‘President of Ichkeria’ Aslan Maskhadov was gunned down March 8th, 2005, in the Chechen village of The house in which Maskhadov was hiding was blown up, and the ruins razed by a bulldozer. The bloodiest warlord, Shamil Basayev, was killed on the night of July 10th, 2006, in the explosion of a truck loaded with ammunition on the outskirts of the Ingush village of Ekazhevo. Fragments of Basayev’s body were found after laboratory examination at Ministry of Defense laboratory No. 124 in Rostov. It is already known that these will not be released to his relatives. How to judge the dead? By GENNADY SAVCHENKO, survey prepared by ALEXANDER SARGIN, March 14th, 2007 Material published in ‘Gazeta’ #46, March 15th, 2007 Julius Rybakov, human rights advocate: If a man is killed while he has weapons in hand, and if there are witnesses to the fact that he took part in certain events, then you can determine that he was a terrorist in a court of law. Speaking strictly legally, you need to hold a hearing and get a court decision. I do not know of any other way to determine one fact or another, including matters relating to these events. In my opinion, such an amendment to the law on countering terrorism was adopted immediately after the events connected with the attack on Pavel Krasheninnikov, chairman of the Federal Parliamentary Committee on Civil, Criminal, Arbitral and Procedural Legislation: During the adoption of this provision of the law there were some rather serious discussions. The law passed, however, and in accordance with it the law enforcement agencies can specifically consider in each case whose bodies may be released, and whose may not. Even after the capture of the Malik Saidullayev, businessman: I think that the government must always act humanely, regardless of where people were killed, whether Kabardino-Balkaria or Chechnya, and it does not matter what social caste they belonged to, or whether they were suicide bombers or somebody else. In my opinion, the body must be released. People are in mourning, so why it worse? Why can a mother not be given her son’s body, or a wife not be given her husband’s body? Sazhi Umalatova, chairman of the ‘Peace and Unity’ political party of Russia: To this end, we have organs of inquiry and investigation. How else can we establish that a person was a terrorist? If he held a weapon in his hands, and he was shooting left and right, then he is a real terrorist! Who else could he be? If we have the law, then it must be followed. I cannot imagine terrorists committing a crime somewhere in the U.S. and dissenting citizens going somewhere to file a petition! I am for the certainty of punishment, after all, the country was not created so that terrorists could stroll around and shoot right and left. (The bodies of) the innocent have to be released, but if they are guilty, then the Russian law is for one and all! Gennady Gudkov, member of the Federal Parliamentary Committee on Security: It is obvious that identification of bodies is carried out with the participation of several witnesses, and afterwards identity is established. Of course, additional examinations can be carried out, right up to determination of their DNA, or, say, the structural features of their teeth. Afterwards authorities act in accordance with the law, under which the corpses of insurgents and terrorists killed during counter-terrorist operations are not released (to relatives), but are buried them in unmarked graves. This applies to all nationalities and all faiths. That is, when a person joins the terrorist underground and commits a crime, he should understand that in the event of his death he will be buried in a pauper’s, unmarked grave, and especially without any kind of honors. Yes, the relatives probably have some perfectly justified emotions, but we cannot say that it this is a violation of Russian law. Such is Russian law! Views: 7214 |
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6 |
||||||||
Be first to comment this article
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| 2006 - 2024 © Ìåìîðèàë ïîãèáøèõ â Íîðä-Îñòå. Êíèãà ïàìÿòè |
|
|
|
|
|