ïîñëåäíèå íîâîñòè |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina |
Óæå 22 ãîäà... |
24/10/24 13:38 more... |
author Àíîíèì |
Kurbatova, Christina |
Äåòêè Ìèëûå, õîðîøèå íàøè äåòêè!!! Òàê ïðîñòî íå äîëæíî áûòü, ýòî áîëüíî, ýòî íå÷åñòíî, ýòî óæàñíî. |
30/06/24 01:30 more... |
author Îëüãà |
Grishin, Alexey |
Ïàìÿòè Àëåêñåÿ Äìèòðèåâè÷à Ãðèøèíà Ñâåòëàÿ ïàìÿòü ïðåêðàñíîìó ÷åëîâåêó! Ìû ðàáîòàëè â ÃÌÏÑ, òîãäà îí áûë ìîëîäûì íà÷àëüíèêîì îòäåëà ìåòàëëîâ, ïîäàþùèì áîëü... |
14/11/23 18:27 more... |
author Áîíäàðåâà Þëèÿ |
Panteleev, Denis |
Âîò óæå è 21 ãîä , à áóäòî êàê â÷åðà !!!! |
26/10/23 12:11 more... |
author Èðèíà |
Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina |
Ïîìíèì. |
24/10/23 17:44 more... |
author Àíîíèì |
‘IVASI’ CAST THEIR NETS |
Written by Àëåêñàíäð Ãîëîâåíêî | ||||||||
Âòîðíèê, 24 Äåêàáðü 2002 | ||||||||
Survivors of
He was also modestly silent about other salary arrears in Russia, which now exceed 35 billion rubles and which the state is loath to collect from debtor companies. Thus ended this saga of extortion on the part of the bankrupt organizers of the musical. The show’s chief producer, G. Vasilyev, artfully carried this out in the media all month long, and tried to dislodge many tears from us. It became rare case: the government is to cover the losses of a private enterprise at the expense of the taxpayers. A preliminary shelling, conducted with all artillery at Mr. Vasiliev’s disposal, softened up public opinion. It began with Mr. Vasiliev and a group of actors arranging a meeting with Vladimir Putin, followed by Deputy Prime Minister Valentina Matvienko and Culture Minister Mikhail Shvydkoi stating that there would certainly have to be a revival of the musical in the very same theater, and promising assistance. Money flowed as if from a horn of plenty. The Open Russia Fund, under oligarch Khodorkovsky, has allocated two million dollars to create a road version of the musical, and Moscow city hall has begun repairing the theatrical center using money from the capital city’s own budget. For some reason, however, no one from the Kremlin, or the government, has asked the owners of Link, Inc.: Why are the taxpayers responsible for your commercial risk? You are a private company and should have insured your business, and besides: do you not consider that this ‘revival’ of your musical is starting to look a lot like dancing on the victims’ blood? Is this not making a mockery of the victims, including your own actors? Would it not be better to just make another show? The logic of the owners of Link, Inc. is as simple as a stick: they want to get back the money they expended. As the newspapers trumpeted in October of last year, Things really started to swing, just like on Broadway, with 4 million dollars to be spent on special effects, which they are to receive this October. So, it was not simply “a hunk of cheese,” but millions of dollars that the duo was fighting for while portraying themselves as poor as a Kazan orphan. In this regard, Mr. Vasiliev responded with much hypocrisy and servility to the Kremlin when he told a reporter: “I heard that Parliament is trying to put together a commission to investigate the causes of the terrorist attack. It seems to me that it’d be much better for the country if they’d put together a parliamentary committee on a revival of Ask, you shall receive, but from out of our pockets. Tsekalo, in turn, has joyfully declared that the musical has planned pleasant tours abroad in the future, and in particular, it expects to go on stage in New York on September 11th, 2003. That is, to organize another dance on victims’ blood, especially if you are someone who believes that the Americans themselves staged these air raids. And really, why form a commission to investigate the causes of the terrorist attack? It might end up finding out some things that could be very unpleasant for the president. For example: his refusal to personally participate in resolving the crisis. Or the gullibility and irresponsibility of the security ministers, starting with FSB Director N. Patrushev. Or the murder of the musical’s spectators with an unknown gas — the use of which they try to cover up using every weapon at their disposal. Or the universal disorder during the rescue of the survivors, for which other St. Petersburg friends of Putin are responsible: Health Minister Yuri Shevchenko and Minister of Emergency Situations Sergei Shoigu. And we will not even mention Premier V. Kasyanov, who was drifting rootless abroad during the days of tragedy. Therefore, it is ridiculous to say that such terrorist attacks will never happen again. The promise voiced three years ago about “dunking terrorists in the outhouse” has turned into an endless war, which already goes on according to its own rules. 100 THOUSAND FOR A DAUGHTER Meanwhile, what about the surviving victims who are not favored by the sovereign’s care? How are they doing these days? They have it rough. Everywhere they turn, they are received as pesky petitioners. Neither the government, nor the Parliament have written any laws which would define treatment for former hostages and relatives of the victims, or allocate and pay for additional trips to sanatoriums, or medicine and improved housing. That is why many victims of the “hostage rescue” feel that Putin and his ministers have used the 100- or 50-thousand rubles of Dr. Liana Akhapkina works at the Vishnevsky military hospital in Krasnogorsk. Her fellow physicians at the hospital are bothered that, after Zhenya’s death, no one came to Liana with words of consolation: neither the hospital chief, nor the local government, nor Mr. Vasiliev, the owner I went to meet them at their apartment, a Khrushchev-era We go sit in the kitchen and use hot tea to warm ourselves. The radiators on the first floor of this building work very poorly, so they always have to keep electric space heaters switched on. It certainly leads to high electrical bills, but at least they do not freeze to death. It is perhaps because of this cold and damp that they suspect Masha to have tuberculosis. Upon learning that a journalist had come to visit, we are soon joined in conversation by Svetlana, the wife of Liana’s late brother. Svetlana, together with Liana and Andrei, spent all 58 terrible hours of the hostage crisis in the gym at the PTU where the government had assembled families of the hostages. “Just look at how tight they are packed in here,” says the “Did you contact the hospital chief about an apartment?” I ask the hostess. “A hundred times,” answers Liana. “"He’d write on the form: ‘To the housing commission’, and it would disappear over there, and so on every year. I went to him the other day and said: Yuri Viktorovich, you know I can’t stay here any longer. Everything reminds me of Zhenya. And without raising his head from his desk he replied: ‘I don’t have anything for you’. I reminded him that there was a new building for rent in Archangelsk, and he said that they only had two or three apartments set aside for us and they’ve all been allocated, so I left with nothing. Who do we need to see? And here they talk about “care on behalf of the president and the government.” AUSCHWITZ A visit by Liana Georgiyevna to district head B. Rasskazov also proved fruitless. He did not refuse, and his assistant, P. Kravchuk, offered to write up a statement and make some calls. Perhaps something could be found, but using pull from her mother, the veteran of the frontlines. “Did the young man who watched the play with your daughter remember how it all started?” I ask. “Yes, Ivan told me,” answers Liana. “At around 4:50 am he and Zhenya noticed the gas. He laid her head on his shoulder and assured her: ‘Sleep, everything will be fine’. She died on his shoulder. ‘Vanya’ (Ivan) work up in the hospital. At around 5:50 am the assault began, so Zhenya and all the hostages were under the influence of gas for about an hour. Later in the morgue they showed us her picture. She was sitting in a chair, dead, and Vanya was already gone. That means the security services had time to take pictures. So tell me this: why did they shoot the sleeping Chechen women? Couldn’t they have taken pity on them and at least ‘leave’ a few for questioning?” A short, elderly woman enters the kitchen, one hand on a cane and the other against the wall. She is Liana’s mother. She sits down on a stool and is barely able to say through her sobs: “The fascists at Auschwitz killed people with gas, but these did it right there in a theater hall.” I ask: “They told me that Zhenya and her young man were going to get married.” Andrei nods, and once again Liana sighs: “When they were taken hostage, they agreed that if they got out of there alive they’d go to the marriage registry office. Zhenya called me about it, and Andrei and I gave our blessing and prayed for them. At the hospital, first somebody from the FSB talks with Vanya, then an investigator from the prosecutor’s office comes and records everything. Later some doctor worked with him. We think he was a hypnotist. Vanya somehow became very closed about it, and his memories have changed. He keeps repeating that had it not been for the assault, he wouldn’t be alive. He’s already separated himself from Zhenya somehow, and he didn’t recognize their friend at the hospital. What is this, the fentanyl?” DIAGNOSIS: DELIBERATE MURDER “Perhaps you can you tell me why those who were killed by the gas were all cut open from the chin down?” asks Svetlana, perplexed. “Why did they cut up our Zhenya? The doctor at the morgue said it was at the request of the prosecutor’s office, something about a criminal case, and they had to establish the cause of death. We think they were testing a new chemical weapon and wanted to see how it acted on the heart, lungs, and brain. They even did cranial trepanation on them. They kept them on water and juice for two day in order to prepare for the effect of the gas, and so that fewer of them would choke on vomit in their sleep.” These are not questions for a journalist. If, indeed, there had been an autopsy, then it is not clear why the death certificate of Yevgeniya Anatolyevna Usvalieva states: cause of death is established — victim of terrorism. The answer is clear: in giving such a diagnosis to the dead, this absolves the Kremlin of any accusation of deliberately murdering these people. “It’s a terrible thing,” says the Gradually the conversation turns to the 100 thousand rubles (~$3800) of ‘material assistance’ for her poisoned daughter, something akin to mockery. Yes, some money could and should have been set aside, but in last place, after words of sympathy and concern for the fate of the heartbroken families. Warm words and participation never appeared. Why have these families, in contrast to relatives of the crew of the submarine Kursk, still not met with the president, or received any words of comfort, even though the government is a hundred times guiltier in this latest tragedy? Why all this government concern for the play Liana and Andrei heard that some of the These are simple people, and they behave honorably in the face of the grief that has befallen them, in contrast to those nosy “muses of the public servants,” who for the sake of profits sing hymns to the government that murdered their fellow minstrels, and perform joyful dances on the blood. Alexander Golovenko, in zavtra.ru December 24th, 2002 Views: 10703 |
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6 |
< Prev | Next > |
---|