home arrow 2011 arrow Karinna Moskalenko

home | домой

RussianEnglish

similar

Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina
Уже 22 года...
24/10/24 13:38 more...
author Аноним

Kurbatova, Christina
Детки
Милые, хорошие наши детки!!! Так просто не должно быть, это больно, это нечестно, это ужасно.
30/06/24 01:30 more...
author Ольга

Grishin, Alexey
Памяти Алексея Дмитриевича Гришина
Светлая память прекрасному человеку! Мы работали в ГМПС, тогда он был молодым начальником отдела металлов, подающим боль...
14/11/23 18:27 more...
author Бондарева Юлия

Panteleev, Denis
Вот уже и 21 год , а будто как вчера !!!!
26/10/23 12:11 more...
author Ирина

Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina
Помним.
24/10/23 17:44 more...
author Аноним

Karinna Moskalenko
Written by Анна Строганова   
Четверг, 25 Ноябрь 1999

Karinna Moskalenko: “Besides the European Court, we do not have anything else we can count on”

Адвокат Карина Москаленко Rosa Malsagova / RFIKarinna Moskalenko, the attorney representing the ‘Nord-Ost’ victims at the European Court of Human Rights, talks about the case’s progress in Strasbourg, which has become became her clients’ last hope.

October 24th marks the 9 years from the date of the seizure of hostages in the theater on Dubrovka in Moscow. 912 people had come to see the musical ‘Nord-Ost’, and on October 26th, 2002, during the assault 130 of them were killed, according to official figures. The investigation into the terrorist attack was called off in 2007, but reopened again this year.

RFI: In April 2003, six months after the terrorist attack on Dubrovka, you filed a complaint at the ECHR against the government of Russia. Just last year the court finally ruled on the admissibility of the complaint.

Karinna Moskalenko: This was preceded by some very serious work. You cannot assume that the court did nothing at all during those years, though, of course, my principals, and I, as their representative, their attorney, believe that work on this case has been going on for a very long time. But still, this was preceded by a long round of communications. Communication (in jurisprudence) means an exchange of pleadings. You probably know that most cases are done using documents, without a hearing in a trial. The sides, instead of verbally expressing their opinions, pass back and forth these so-called memoranda, in which they answer the court’s questions and describe their legal position in the case.

Now the European Court has ruled on the admissibility of the complaint on all key issues. But as to whether it considers issues raised by my principals to be violations, we will find this out only in its final decision.

And when will this be, you were going to ask, and I will tell you that I do not know. All I can say is that this year we, all the applicants’ representatives, appealed to the ECHR right after the summer holidays and asked them to orient us regarding the timing of what the Court stated regarding the case being ruled on with a final decision this year. We are hoping that the court stays within this timeframe.

RFI: Today, 9 years afterwards, while the Russian authorities are doing their best to see this tragedy is forgotten, might it seem that a fair decision by the Strasbourg Court is the only hope of the victims’ families?

Karinna Moskalenko: I cannot be so dogmatic as to say that the Russian authorities are doing their best to see that this tragedy is forgotten. I have been told that the Moscow city government was involved in publishing the Book of Memory. From this book everyone will learn about these people, it is very, very important. I also heard that a church is to be built. Some have a negative opinion about this, others are positive, but in any case, something is being done.

What the Russian government wants everyone to forget is who is responsible for what. That is what our complaint is not allowing them to do. The entire group of applicants is demanding the truth, waiting for the truth, hoping for the truth.

But here is where you are absolutely correct: besides the European Court, we do not have anything we can count on. If I remember correctly, the investigation has been extended to December. It gets reopened and every time the time passes, people leave, and the more and more of the information becomes restricted, and this does not please the applicants. So we cannot count on results from the investigation that is being performed in Russia, and so our principals, no matter how long it takes, are waiting for a decision from the European Court.

You are going to ask me, fine, they recognize a violation occurred, what next? Well, first of all, it is important, and, secondly, the focus then shifts from the European Court’s decision to its strict enforcement, and as far as the enforcement of such a decision, there will probably be certain measures awaiting my clients. I do not wish to name these measures or comment on them ahead of time, but we will certainly demand a genuine investigation (into the terrorist attack), with access to all information.


Views: 4168 | E-mail

  Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze — www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

 
< Prev   Next >