Nord-Ost - Мемориал погибших в Норд-Осте. Книга памяти

2009

Nord-Ost

today

последние новости
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002

Уже 22 года...

24/10/24 13:38 more...

author Аноним

Kurbatova, Christina

Детки
Милые, хорошие наши детки!!! Так просто не должно быть, это больно, это нечестно, это ужасно.

30/06/24 01:30 more...

author Ольга

Grishin, Alexey

Памяти Алексея Дмитриевича Гришина
Светлая память прекрасному человеку! Мы работали в ГМПС, тогда он был молодым начальником отдела металлов, подающим боль...

14/11/23 18:27 more...

author Бондарева Юлия

Panteleev, Denis

Вот уже и 21 год , а будто как вчера !!!!

26/10/23 12:11 more...

author Ирина

Ustinovskaya, Yekaterina

Помним.

24/10/23 17:44 more...

author Аноним

Nord-Ost

Written by Юлия Латынина

Понедельник, 02 Ноябрь 2009

Once upon a time there was an Egyptian named Mohammed Atta. He studied at the University of Hamburg. Mohamed Atta did not really excel. He kept to himself and would all the time curse the infidels, together with his three companions, with whom he would visit the Al-Coots mosque. His companions were Emirates-born Marwan al-Shehhi, Yemeni Ramzi bin al-Shibh, and Lebanese Ziad Jarrah. Ziad Jarrah his whole life had dreamed of becoming a pilot, and on September 11th, 2001, his dream came true.

In 1995, Atta returned to Cairo, where the authorities, as luck would have it, assigned him to work on the tiny foreign quarter. He was supposed to take an old Egyptian neighborhood, rebuild it, and resettle it the actors in the native garb. Atta, of course, called this: «bowing low to the West».

Atta returned to Hamburg and worked for the ‘Plankontor’ architectural bureau, prayed in a mosque, and rented an apartment for four with his friends. On the rent checks he wrote ‘Dar El-Ansar’ (House of the Prophet's Companions). Perhaps he and his comrades would have continued signing checks in this manner, but in 1998 Osama bin Laden declared jihad against America and blew up two U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. The organization headed by bin Laden was called al-Qaeda.

This event all at once changed not only Mohammed Atta's life, but also the entire world. Before this there had been two types of Islamic fundamentalists: there were movements, like the Group Islamique Armee in Algeria, which declared jihad against their own rulers, who, in their opinion, had become apostates, and there were angry individuals who could not succeed in the West, people such as Mohammed Atta.

The fundamentally new element that bin Laden introduced was his announced jihad against America, 'the far enemy', a jihad that was to take priority over victory over the 'near enemy'. The embassy bombings served as excellent advertisements. Money and volunteers poured in, and al-Qaeda instantly turned into a kind of venture-fund terrorist organization. Business plans would be brought to al-Qaeda, and al-Qaeda would provide financing, and, if necessary, martyrs and training camps.

In November of 1999, Atta, Jarrah, al-Shehhi and bin al-Shibh brought their business plan to bin Laden. Getting there was simple enough: the Taliban had been provided ideal conditions in Afghanistan. Their idea was brought to the court at Tora Bora, and two men from bin Laden's inner circle were assigned to support the Hamburg cell: Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazm. Al-Hazm had by this time fought in Chechnya, while al-Midhar once told his brother that he was going there, but it is not known whether or not he actually did.

Also assigned to assist were thirteen young, enthusiastic fundamentalists — cannon fodder — who were selected right there from training camps in Haldan and Al Farouk. Their only purpose was to control the passengers. Four of the boys, the brothers Wail and Waleed al-Shehri, and the brothers Ahmed and Hamza al-Hamdi, were also getting ready to go to Chechnya, but when instead of Chechnya they were offered the Twin Towers, it was as if instead of performing at a small town theater they were going to star in a Hollywood blockbuster.

Why am I talking in such detail about all this? Because if anyone in the U.S. found it necessary to know what happened on 9/11, he or she could easily do so.

He or she could learn the names of all the terrorists, that Ziad Jarrah wanted to fly and that Mohamed Atta had been dismissed from his job. He or she could learn that they attended the Al-Coots mosque and that Mohammed Atta was in Afghanistan for a year before their joint trip. He or she could read the biographies of Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazm, and find out that when it was discovered that these two bearded veterans could not learn how to fly a plane, others were located: Saudi Hani Hanzhura and Zakaria Moussaoui, a Frenchman who was also originally designated a pilot, but got arrested and was only able to fly to jail.

There are morons, of course, who do not know anything about this, and do not want to know, because they already know that the CIA blew up the Twin Towers. Learning something that might complement their secret and comprehensive knowledge is beneath the dignity of these morons.

But what does all this have to do with me? Tell me, what do we know about 'Nord-Ost'? The answer is: nothing. In Investigator Kalchuk's resolution, it is written that Basayev began organizing an attack «on an undisclosed location» under «circumstances not identified by the investigation».

How many people were killed there? Attorney Igor Trunov, to whom we are no less obliged for investigating 'Nord-Ost' than we are to Investigator Kalchuk, while he was handling the case the number was 130. When another lawyer, Karinna Moskalenko, simply added up lists of people known to have died in the hospitals, it came to 174.

How many terrorists were there? Forty were killed. Investigator Kalchuk states that the organization «selected at least 52 persons.» There were 52, and all died, leaving 40 corpses.

From sheer envy, Lobachevsky and Gedel (ed: mathematicians) are spinning in their graves out of envy. A certain Siberian security officer was telling a certain friend of mine that, on the night of the assault, he was drunkenly wandering near 'Nord-Ost' and, after the assault, he got through the cordon and helped carry out hostages. He was drunk and did not remember how he placed them: face up, or face down. This, of course, is not information, but more or less hearsay. But if the security officer got in, what could have stopped someone from getting out?

What were the names of the terrorists? We already know the names of 33, because they found 33 passports at 'Nord-Ost'. Some were without a passport, and some got lost. But, excuse me, on September 11th there was not even dust remaining from these people, and yet the Americans found out every name. Over here everyone was in one piece, but it is not known who he or she was. There was an Arab, Yassir. Who was Yassir? What was Yassir? Why did the Americans count their Arabs, while at Dubrovka they did not? A couple of years later, Colonel-General Yedelev told 'Rossiyskaya Gazeta' about the Arab terrorist Yassir, operating in the North Caucasus. Did it turn out that Yassir got away from 'Nord-Ost'?

It seems that there was an internal investigation at the FSB as to why so many who were thought to be agents of the FSB were found among the terrorists. Did this happen, or not?

In Investigator Kalchuk's resolution, the dead terrorists are described in this way: «AKHMETOV Mumadievich Ahmed, member of the 'Jama-at' Wahhabi movement. BIMURZAEV Magomed Emit Saidanovich, member of the 'Jama-at' Wahhabi movement.»

I do not even know what to say about this to Investigator Kalchuk. 'Jamaat' is not the name of a movement. It simply means 'community'. Jamaat may be a traditional, Wahhabi village. You can pray with the whole Jamaat, and the Jamaat may choose an imam, and act for or against something. How would you react to an investigator who wrote that a dead suspect was a member of, for example, the Orekhovsky 'community' group?

What kind of gas was used? The Americans, when the Twin Towers collapsed, wrote entire volumes and built entire mathematical theories from this, but we do not know what gas was used, even though Putin knows that this gas was «harmless.»

I want everyone to know that the men who took 'Nord-Ost' were also poisoned, because you cannot shoot in a gasmask. When the men burst into the auditorium they tossed away their gasmasks and breathed whatever it was. And then, intoxicated, they carried out the hostages (and they were never told what to do with the hostages). They had never planned at all on surviving. They thought that they were all going to die. They survived, and many still do not have apartments.

How was the terrorist attack prepared? How did they get to their destination? Where did they stay? The Americans have answers down to minute by minute, but we have nothing reliable. What is the story with the gay club for VIPs at 'Nord-Ost', a club that was remodeled by Chechens? If this was so, then explain what happened. If this was not so, then prove that it was not. The investigator for the case merely yelled at victims and insulted a judge.

This does not mean that 'Nord-Ost' was a complete failure. Even under the cloak of secrecy, we can see that some things could be graded 'excellent'. There were negotiations with the terrorists, which lulled them to a lower level of alertness and caused them to treat the hostages much less harsh than at Beslan. Perhaps it was only due to such negotiations that two female suicide bombers did not blow themselves up in Moscow crowds recently. Apparently the people who participated in the negotiations were somehow able to smuggle secret devices into the auditorium and measure every millimeter — where the bomb was hanging, where the suicide bombers were sitting, where they had detonators and where they did not. It seems that there were no remote-controlled detonators, but if any one of the suicide bombers had blown themselves up in that auditorium, then it would have set them all off. And, finally, the assault: though it presented a deadly risk, it was worked out to the last detail.

The problem is that we do not know what worked, and what failed. We do not know who should have been given medals, and who should have had their epaulets torn away. We do not know who was responsible for the impeccable intelligence and the assault, and who was to make sure they injected the antidote, and if it was only one person who was supposed to do this, or two.

It is because most of the hostages did not die from the gas. They died from losing consciousness, being laid face up on their backs, and choking on their own tongues. They died because they were not given first aid on the spot. They died because the buses in which they were put were stuck in a traffic jam.

Think about it: a successful operation turns into a nightmare because people were placed face up, not face down.

And we do not know if it was Pronichev, Luzhkov, or Shoiga who was responsible. We do know, however, that none of them was held responsible, because none of them was fired.

I would worry about what I do not know. It is not a matter of my personal curiosity. It just turns out that one general’s stupid command killed one hundred seventy-four people, people who had been saved thanks to the sacrifice of the Special Forces. No one is held accountable and it has become clear that they can do anything they want.

During Beslan nobody even thought about rescuing hostages. They just blew them away with the terrorists.

Printed in 'Ezhednevniy Zhurnal'

Views: 7099 | E-mail

Comments (2)

1. Что я знаю
Written by Алена Михайлова, on 09-11-2009 11:15
Пять баллов за статью и вопросы в ней поставленные!
Если мы, люди там побывавшие,уже столько лет собирающие информацию, разыскивающие документы, свидетельскме показания и т. д.,понимаем, что «белых пятен» в этой трагедии еще тысяча. То, что говорить о простых людях, которые об этой трагедии слышали лишь то, что им захотели сказать! Куда не глянь, сплошная государственная тайна, просто скопление чьих-то интересов. И вот это нежелание объяснить, рассказать и повиниться, бесит ужасно, поэтому не хочется прощать. забывать и т. д.А ведь у нас растут дети,по чьим судьбам прошелся терроризм, значит эти вопросы еще будут поставлены перед властью ни один раз!

Report

2. не согласен с оценкой штурма
Written by Иван, on 16-10-2010 16:00
штурм, думаю, состоялся только тогда, когда стало ясно — взрыва не будет. Этого взрыва как решения всех своих проблем ждали президент и т. н. штаб.
Преступление городских властей и лужкова и МЧС и в том, что пути эвакуации за 3 дня остались неподготовленными под предлогом все-таки вероятности и случайного взрыва, первая помощь — вынесли и лицом вверх это грубо, но ведь и посаженные в автобус живыми люди умирали Сидя!!!, Это газ, секретный газ, государственный газ, как нацистский «табун» приготовлен для всех неудобных власти случаев… Уже только за сокрытие его состава — пожизненное давать надо…

Report

Write Comment
Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article. Personal verbal attacks will be deleted. Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed. Just ensure to Refresh your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button. Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
Comment:
Code:*
	I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

< Prev		Next >

[ Back ]

Joomla SEF URLs by Artio

today

Kazakstan

other

similar