A man in a black coat with a white armband is carrying another man
	The laying figure is hand-cuffed. He is face down
	They continue to carry people out
	A small gap is visible at times between the lying man's face and the pavement (struggling?)
	A woman in a black coat with a white armband overtakes these two
	The laying man is placed face down in the corner by the entrance
	The man in the coat turns the lying man over….
	The woman in the black coat raises a pistol
	The woman in the black coat fires (a shot is audible on the tape)
	The woman grips the pistol after recoil
	The woman lowers the pistol
	The man in black drags the body off by the handcuffs
	The body is lying by along the wall
	The man goes through the clothes of the lying figure. The woman walks away
	The woman is doing something with the pistol. Everything is as if everyday. Afterwards she will lead the hostages out

       These representative frames (and the entire tape with sound) do not explain anything about the Nord-Ost story. They only add riddles.
       This episode, and there are others on the tape, also demanding answers, give birth to a while row of questions.
       If this was a live prisoner — he was in handcuffs — was it necessary to shoot him?
       If it was necessary, why then? He was a witness, nevertheless.
       If he was a witness, of what then?
       If he was dead, why did they carry him from the building, when not all of the hostages had been evacuated from the hall — visible on the tape — and (if he was dead) why was it necessary to shoot him later?
       It's true, the were some who were carrying people out who wore camouflage, helmets, and carried assault rifles, the woman who fired was from a different group, in black coats with white armbands and pistols.
       Forty years ago Zaprudor accidently filmed the Kennedy assasination. It became evident that there were more shots that were officially declared, and more than one murderer. The film showed that there was a plot, but nothing was ever proven.
       It's possible that this tape will also never prove a thing, but it shows that in the official version, all was not so…
       But why?
       Why did she shoot him?

        Novaya Gazeta
       01.12.2003

Comments (3)

3. Зачем она в него стреляла? Written by Виктор Балабанов , on 10-09-2012 23:27 Моя догадка: Она из спец-служб «убрала» «связующее звено» с террористами, через которое спецслужбы провели операцию по захвату ДК во время спектакля, руками бандитов — цель захвата: в очередной раз поселить в головы россиян мнение, что нужна «сильная рука» во власти — нужен Президент-силовик… Расстрелянный у стен ДК мог открыть то, что НЕ ДОЛЖНО БЫЛО СТАТЬ ИЗВЕСТНЫМ!.. Вывод для нормальной власти: ЛЮБОЕ убийство — и ЭТО! — должно быть наказуемо судом!.. Report

Write Comment
Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article. Personal verbal attacks will be deleted. Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed. Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button. Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
Comment:
Code:*
	I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze — www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved